
Rubin's article on pornography has kept me thinking about other issues which are fought on the basis of moral grounds, but often turn out to be a question of taste, aesthetic. She emphasizes in the article that she does not believe women are 'more' exploited in the sex industry than they are in general in the work force. Yet, the 'body' makes it obscene, makes it degrading [because sex isnt inherently degrading?].. I want to be perfectly clear that I am not dismissing this exploitation and its realities, but there does appear to be an unfair and curious imbalance of attention...
I see parallels with the 'sex scandals' of politicians. Almost never is the scandal about the potential exploitation of the women involved, or an abuse of power on the part of the man-- rather an infidelity, or the fact that sleeping with a prostitute is 'sleazy'.. (who is that more 'degrading' to?)
Gallop comes to mind, with her call to 'think through the body'... how prudish are we? In how many ways are we constantly disembodying women in the name of a higher ideal?
I am very interested to hear your own experiences/thoughts on the matter. I find as an 'intellectual woman' I am constantly being disembodied by those around me-- in another sense it is a refuge-- arguably a masculine one....?